Please note that you may have been redirected (you might like to make a note of the URL in the address bar of your browser and update accordingly) This is a permanent archvie but is no longer actively maintained. Please visit http://joshuaink.com for the latest updates.

Troll 2.0

Sunday January 15, 2006

WARNING: This post contains opinions that are my own.

I am starting to feel like a pioneer, a man so far ahead of the loop that history can surely only look back and see my utter genius. What it all comes down to is my arse, and the fact that I have been talking out of it since way back when. When most were talking about attribute selectors and the star hack, I was already talking out of my arse.

But what thanks do I get for being the leader of an increasingly fashionable trend, for making it easier for others to follow, for opening up the floor for other web developers to talk complete and utter bollocks on their blogs without even a twinge of guilt? None, that’s what. I don’t get listed on blogrolls, I don’t get invited to talk as an inspirational speaker. When a round of opinions are needed from the leaders in the field, do I get asked to join the fun? No sir, I do not.

Why is this I ask? Sometimes I stay up all night wondering where I went wrong, why I can’t break out, move on to bigger and better things, why am I stuck here with a meager 2,500+ uniques per day and a tiny readership of no more than 1,500 readers. Why, when I am clearly the field leader in talking crap to a crowd that laps it up without question, and then it struck me, straight in the feed readers, ooofff! my BPP ratio is too low, of course!

In fact the situation, in it’s very essence, requires that it be a little more complex than it seems in order to resolve itself satisfactorily. My situation may seem, on the surface at least, to be simple enough but a low BPP to actual content (AC) ratio is not in itself enough to consign me to the doldrums.

No, in order to necessitate change I must first recognise that my FPP ratio is higher than the AC and BPP percentages combined; and we all know that this simply will not do (you may know this more commonly as a low signal to noise ratio, or to the layman, the golden rule cast aside). What I clearly need is a Watertight Analytical Necessary Chart. Only this physical manifestation of my problem can help give me the stimulus I need to begin to re-assign.

As the W.A.N Chart above shows, my FPP ratio is dangerously high, the first step is to clean up my .act. What I need, though, is something to facilitate the clean up whilst keeping this web log accessible to those who have taste disabled in their browsers. But what would be sufficiently Web 2.0 enough to begin the reduction of my FPP (the clean up) and start the increase of my BPP (the return to the flock) whilst maintaining the, apparent, symbiosis between myself and my core readership? Ahhhhhh yeeeeeessssss, of course:

Even this first, small step, makes me feel better and now I simply need to create an opportunity to go off on a tangent in order to take my first step into the overuse, and total misuse, of big words thus removing any rhythm, rhyme or indeed personality from my musings.

My use of unnecessary, and, somewhat, excessive, punctuation has, because I am, undereducated, always been present; a necessary part of increasing, the BPP, this much I have always understood. My next, and most important step, is to create a situation where I can fastcanbobulate my writing in order that I make an otherwise short, to the point, sentence considerably longer and more confusing by inserting, for the most part, unnecessary and sometimes meaningless words that do nothing to assist the more fundamental nature of the message. In short before I can increase my BPP I must increase my [other] BPP and my WPS.

My site, by it’s transcendental nature, is also highly suggestive of a finished product, polished to the point of perfection, a done deal if you will. But, that is not so; clearly to the educated I, it is in a state of constant morphallaxis and now never more so than now, more so, now errr.. now that I revealed my desire to become an acolyte to the chosen few, rather than a free thinker I need a clear and definite indicator of this ongoing re-growth, this re-birth and, because of the utterly cool nature of my transgression, I might add, re-mix.

Initially I thought Beta, it seemed logical enough to communicate the message of my coming, a loud, clear and accessible cry out to the flock to wait, that I will rejoin the fold shortly but then the words started swimming around, transformamorphogising in my head: flock, sheep, beta… no, no, not Beta but something that reflects better, my sheep like ambitions.

And so lady and gentlemens I would like to officiously announce that the Joshuaink Web Log [2.0] is now officially named Bleater by Joshuaink. Branding to follow.

  1. Nik Steffen

    1089 days ago

    Bleader, what a catchy name.

    Simple Answer: Stop Offering Feeds. That way your visitors will have to access your site, not just those scrummy Newsreaders. Although that MIGHT JUST have an affect on your total readership.

    So, scratch that. Just use the Bleach.
  2. Julian Schrader

    1089 days ago

    bq. WARNING: This post contains opinions that are my own.

    LOL, great post John! But why doesn’t this textile thingy work (at least in preview)?
  3. lm

    1089 days ago

    i havent got a clue (well i see a move in a right direction though)but i think ths tablet of chat diagram should be as 3d as an ajax bleach
  4. Rob Wilmshurst

    1089 days ago

    That’s wonderful.
    A new year, a fresh new direction for the Joshuaink We—I mean Bleater.

    Could I commission you to make a W.A.N.C for my site? Is good.
  5. Nik Steffen

    1089 days ago

    Hahaha my bad. Bleater. There we go. I was wondering why you went with Bleader, but Bleater obviously makes more sense.
  6. Matt Robin

    1089 days ago

    FANTASTICO!

    An article of such sheer briliance that I bet that man Malarkey had wished he could reverse his award for ‘Blog of the Year’ and make you the winner instead….(except that was for 2005…but details, details, details!!)

    Bleater eh? Sheep bleat…and you being Welsh….well…mmm….
  7. Richard Medek

    1088 days ago

    What I need, though, is something to facilitate the clean up whilst keeping this web log accessible to those who have taste disabled in their browsers.

    Holy shit, that is the funniest thing I’ve read all year. I mean, I know we’re 14 days into it and all but, still, it seems promising.
  8. karmatosed

    1088 days ago

    I now have a sore arse from falling off my chair laughing and the dog is looking at me strange. Worth a hoorah just for your use of the word fastcanbobulate.
  9. James AkaXakA

    1088 days ago

    Dear John,

    It has come to my attention that you have made an unauthorized use of my patented ‘Fancyname by’ formula (the “Work”) in the preparation of a work derived therefrom. I have reserved all rights in the Work, first published in 1 November 2005, and have registered copyright therein. Your work entitled ‘Bleater by Joshuaink’ is essentially identical to the Work and clearly used the Work as its basis.

    As you neither asked for nor received permission to use the Work as the basis for Bleater by Joshuaink nor to make or distribute copies, including electronic copies, of same, I believe you have willfully infringed my rights under 17 U.S.C. Section 101 et seq. and could be liable for statutory damages as high as ¬£150,000 as set forth in Section 504©(2) therein.

    I demand that you immediately cease the use and distribution of all infringing works derived from the Work, and all copies, including electronic copies, of same, that you deliver to me, if applicable, all unused, undistributed copies of same, or destroy such copies immediately and that you desist from this or any other infringement of my rights in the future. If I have not received an affirmative response from you by 27 of January 2006 indicating that you have fully complied with these requirements, I shall take further action against you.

    Very truly yours,

    James
  10. Dean Janssen

    1084 days ago

    Awesome.